Skip to content

企业

US · RUSHB #1836 按市值排名 上市于 1970
57.42 -0.50 -0.86%
实时 - 追踪5344个代码 - 心跳于319秒前 · 2026-10-16 20:02

✦ 量化合理价值 计算方式说明

高于合理价值
19.97 合理价值 ≈ 29.11 38.24
  • 基于该股自身过去5年平均市盈率乘以滚动每股收益,推算出的合理价值区间为19.97-38.24。
  • 当前价格比按平均倍数计算的合理价值(29.11)高97.3%。

估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比

市净率 2.82 高于历史水平 第100百分位
5年平均 1.99 · 在Auto & Truck Dealerships中排名第18/23
市盈率 25.49 高于历史水平 第100百分位
5年平均 13.35 · 前瞻 20.19 · 在Auto & Truck Dealerships中排名第10/14
市销率 0.91 高于历史水平 第100百分位
5年平均 0.54 · 前瞻 0.80 · 在Auto & Truck Dealerships中排名第16/26

同业对比 Auto & Truck Dealerships

公司 市值 市盈率(TTM) 市净率 股息率
企业 (RUSHB) 6.70B 25.95 2.88 0.88%
Carvana (CVNA) 42.35B 31.13 10.51 0.00%
Penske Automotive (PAG) 13.95B 15.44 2.40 2.60%
CarMax (KMX) 7.57B 25.04 1.20 0.00%
Lithia Motors (LAD) 6.49B 9.77 1.01 0.75%
AutoNation (AN) 5.35B 7.50 2.37 0.00%

StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。

Morningstar

★★☆☆☆ 合理价值52.45 经济护城河None 不确定性Medium

当前股价高于晨星合理价值估算8.7%。

合理价值

Rush Enterprises Inc receives a 2-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a somewhat unattractive choice, and investors should look elsewhere for more fruitful opportunities. The stock currently trades at a 7% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $52.45 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its medium uncertainty rating.

The firm's valuation metrics decrease our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its enterprise value to market value ratio of 1.2, which falls in the top 40% globally. The market value of equity is low relative to the business' enterprise value, suggesting the company could be buried in debt if anything goes wrong. We believe this is a sign that shares could be expensive.

The firm's balance sheet is an additional cause for concern. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. The firm's EBITDA/interest coverage ratio of 18.8, for example, lies in the top 45% compared with peers globally. The company may have too conservative of a balance sheet based on its high EBITDA/interest coverage ratio, potentially underinvesting in growth opportunities and undermining the long-term trajectory of cash flows. This characteristic further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.

In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.

经济护城河

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, we do not expect this company to materially outearn its cost of capital in the long run. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

作者:Quantitative Equity Report

报价时间 2026-10-16 20:02:28 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。

企业 讨论区 0 条评论

发表评论