Skip to content

艾娃科技

US · AEVA #3251 按市值排名
10.03 -0.97 -8.78%
实时 - 追踪5344个代码 - 心跳于65秒前 · 2026-10-16 20:02

估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比

市净率 36.30 高于历史水平 第93百分位
5年平均 1.57 · 在Software - Infrastructure中排名第148/154
市盈率 -68.29 低于历史水平 第3百分位
5年平均 -7.52 · 前瞻 -6.89
市销率 46.28 低于历史水平 第28百分位
5年平均 71.60 · 前瞻 21.08 · 在Software - Infrastructure中排名第149/173

同业对比 Software - Infrastructure

公司 市值 市盈率(TTM) 市净率 股息率
艾娃科技 (AEVA) 699.15M -47.76 25.39 0.00%
Microsoft (MSFT) 3.93T 29.47 8.88 0.67%
Palantir (PLTR) 447.04B 159.00 45.74 0.00%
Oracle (ORCL) 387.73B 20.10 6.27 1.56%
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 279.76B 855.00 10.18 0.00%
CrowdStrike (CRWD) 232.83B 5,983.95 45.64 0.00%

StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ 合理价值19.91 经济护城河None 不确定性Very High

当前股价低于晨星合理价值估算98.5%。

合理价值

Aeva Technologies Inc is assigned a 3-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 28% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $19.91 per share; however, caution is warranted due to this estimate's very high uncertainty rating.

The firm's balance sheet increases our fair value estimate. Low leverage mitigates financial risk, potentially boosting a firm's value. For example, the firm's current ratio of 7.8 lies in the top 10% compared with peers globally. We have little concern about this company's ability to cover near-term obligations, thanks to its relatively high current ratio; this could be a compelling signal during times of distress, which contributes to our view that shares are undervalued.

On a different note, the company's lack of profitability is potentially concerning. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. The firm's sales yield of 2.4%, a core component of profitability, sits in the bottom 10% globally. This company's inability to generate significant sales growth without meaningful capital investment is a challenge, which, despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, is a negative attribute.

经济护城河

This company lacks a competitive advantage, receiving a quantitative economic moat rating of none. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

作者:Quantitative Equity Report

报价时间 2026-10-16 20:02:21 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。

艾娃科技 讨论区 0 条评论

发表评论