Skip to content

Eagle 材料

US · EXP #2083 按市值排名 上市于 1970
170.01 -0.57 -0.33%
实时 - 追踪5344个代码 - 心跳于271秒前 · 2026-10-16 20:02

✦ 量化合理价值 计算方式说明

低于合理价值
172.63 合理价值 ≈ 205.02 237.42
  • 基于该股自身过去5年平均市盈率乘以滚动每股收益,推算出的合理价值区间为172.63-237.42。
  • 当前价格比按平均倍数计算的合理价值(205.02)低17.1%。

估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比

市净率 3.55 低于历史水平 第1百分位
5年平均 4.95 · 在Building Materials中排名第15/17
市盈率 13.55 低于历史水平 第24百分位
5年平均 15.58 · 前瞻 13.41 · 在Building Materials中排名第3/14
市销率 2.27 低于历史水平 第4百分位
5年平均 3.08 · 前瞻 2.25 · 在Building Materials中排名第11/16

同业对比 Building Materials

公司 市值 市盈率(TTM) 市净率 股息率
Eagle 材料 (EXP) 5.22B 13.40 3.51 0.59%
CRH PLC (CRH) 55.64B 14.78 2.31 1.82%
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 35.57B 12.30 3.08 0.66%
Vulcan Materials (VMC) 33.38B 30.42 3.94 0.78%
Amrize (AMRZ) 20.68B 16.84 1.61 0.00%
James Hardie Industries (JHX) 14.99B 117.36 2.29 0.00%

StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。

Morningstar

★★★★★ 合理价值220.85 经济护城河Narrow 不确定性Low

当前股价低于晨星合理价值估算29.9%。

合理价值

Eagle Materials Inc is assigned a 5-star quantitative star rating, indicating our belief that this share class offers a compelling opportunity for investors. The stock currently trades at a 23% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $220.85 per share, which is reinforced by this estimate's low uncertainty rating.

The firm's valuation metrics increase our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its enterprise value to market value ratio of 1.3, which lies in the top 40% compared with peers globally. While highly leveraged firms can be risky, they can also be highly rewarding. This company's high enterprise value relative to its market value suggests that wise investments will yield outsize returns for investors. We believe this is a sign that shares could be undervalued.

On a different note, the firm's balance sheet is potentially concerning. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. The firm's EBITDA/interest coverage ratio of 13.1, for example, sits in the top 50% compared with global peers. The company may have too conservative of a balance sheet based on its high EBITDA/interest coverage ratio, potentially underinvesting in growth opportunities and undermining the long-term trajectory of cash flows. Despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, this characteristic is a negative attribute.

经济护城河

The company's narrow economic moat rating suggests it should be able to maintain robust profitability for a decade or longer before competition erodes its advantage. In addition, the company's moderate financial health score is decent and doesn't seriously concern us with regard to financial distress.

作者:Quantitative Equity Report

报价时间 2026-10-16 20:02:13 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。

Eagle 材料 讨论区 0 条评论

发表评论