芙兰斯能源
估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比
同业对比 Utilities - Renewable
| 公司 | 市值 | 市盈率(TTM)i | 市净率i | 股息率i |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 芙兰斯能源 (FLNC) | 830.35M | -9.67 | 2.22 | 0.00% |
| Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) | 9.75B | 58.55 | 4.50 | 0.00% |
| Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP) | 8.52B | -64.55 | 1.94 | 5.39% |
| Enel Chile (ENIC) | 6.17B | 11.04 | 1.16 | 4.33% |
| Ormat Technologies (ORA) | 5.49B | 43.78 | 2.11 | 0.54% |
| Brookfield Renewable (BEPC) | 5.32B | -1.36 | -1.60 | 5.34% |
StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。
Morningstar
当前股价低于晨星合理价值估算25.9%。
合理价值
Fluence Energy Inc earns a 3-star quantitative star rating, illustrating our stance that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 5% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $7.30 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its very high uncertainty rating.
The firm's unfavorable dividend structure undermines our fair value estimate. Dividends represent a stable form of future cash flows returned to shareholders, and low dividend payments can increase the perceived risk of a business. Reflecting the firm's dividends is its forward dividend yield of 0%, which ranks in the bottom 30% compared with global peers. This could imply a planned dividend cut or relatively high share price, which contributes to our view that shares are expensive.
On a different note, the firm's valuation metrics are reassuring. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's price to cash ratio of 3.2, for example, ranks in the bottom 30% compared with peers globally. Even if the company were to encounter financial distress, its cash balances could allow it to maneuver effectively. Despite our unfavorable price/fair value ratio, this characteristic is a positive attribute.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
经济护城河
The company's quantitative economic moat rating of none suggests any excess returns could erode quickly as competition arrives. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
作者:Quantitative Equity Report
报价时间 2026-10-16 20:02:12 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。
芙兰斯能源 讨论区 0 条评论