Skip to content

林巴赫

US · LMB #3619 按市值排名 上市于 2016
48.69 +0.89 +1.86%
实时 - 追踪5344个代码 - 心跳于128秒前 · 2026-10-16 19:30

✦ 量化合理价值 计算方式说明

低于合理价值
51.39 合理价值 ≈ 84.65 117.91
  • 基于该股自身过去5年平均市盈率乘以滚动每股收益,推算出的合理价值区间为51.39-117.91。
  • 当前价格比按平均倍数计算的合理价值(84.65)低42.5%。

估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比

市净率 2.99 处于历史正常水平 第40百分位
5年平均 3.95 · 在Building Products & Equipment中排名第19/34
市盈率 20.31 低于历史水平 第25百分位
5年平均 26.21 · 前瞻 15.37 · 在Building Products & Equipment中排名第9/26
市销率 0.89 处于历史正常水平 第49百分位
5年平均 1.05 · 前瞻 0.69 · 在Building Products & Equipment中排名第9/35

同业对比 Building Products & Equipment

公司 市值 市盈率(TTM) 市净率 股息率
林巴赫 (LMB) 580.63M 19.40 2.86 0.00%
Trane Technologies (TT) 100.97B 34.74 11.71 0.87%
Johnson Controls (JCI) 88.12B 25.57 6.54 1.10%
Carrier Global (CARR) 45.34B 37.93 3.45 1.69%
Masco (MAS) 14.37B 16.75 -39.37 1.73%
Madison Air Solutions Corp (MAIR) 13.81B 83.66 3.78 0.00%

StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ 合理价值75.12 经济护城河None 不确定性High

当前股价低于晨星合理价值估算54.3%。

合理价值

While Limbach Holdings Inc may seem inexpensive after its substantial price decline over the past year, we've limited its rating to 3 stars to account for the possibility that it may represent a value trap. The stock currently trades at a 32% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $75.12 per share; however, caution is warranted due to this estimate's high uncertainty rating.

The company's valuation metrics strengthen our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. Reflecting the firm's valuation is its enterprise value to revenue ratio of 0.9, which falls in the bottom 30% compared with global peers. The prevailing enterprise value/sales ratio is low relative to the long-term earnings power of the business. We believe this is a sign that shares could be undervalued.

Conversely, the company's balance sheet is potentially concerning. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. The firm's EBITDA/interest coverage ratio of 16.9, for example, sits in the top 50% compared with peers globally. The company may have too conservative of a balance sheet based on its high EBITDA/interest coverage ratio, potentially underinvesting in growth opportunities and undermining the long-term trajectory of cash flows. Despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, this characteristic is a negative attribute.

经济护城河

This company lacks a competitive advantage, receiving a quantitative economic moat rating of none. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

作者:Quantitative Equity Report

报价时间 2026-10-16 19:30:04 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。

林巴赫 讨论区 0 条评论

发表评论