Skip to content

凯利克斯

US · CALX #2723 按市值排名 上市于 1970
36.50 -0.69 -1.86%
实时 - 追踪5344个代码 - 心跳于67秒前 · 2026-10-16 19:30

估值 各估值倍数与自身5年区间的对比

市净率 3.13 低于历史水平 第17百分位
5年平均 4.41 · 在Software - Infrastructure中排名第72/155
市盈率 46.43 处于历史正常水平 第47百分位
5年平均 70.89 · 前瞻 31.34 · 在Software - Infrastructure中排名第56/83
市销率 2.00 低于历史水平 第4百分位
5年平均 3.54 · 前瞻 1.74 · 在Software - Infrastructure中排名第59/174

同业对比 Software - Infrastructure

公司 市值 市盈率(TTM) 市净率 股息率
凯利克斯 (CALX) 2.30B 48.03 3.24 0.00%
Microsoft (MSFT) 3.93T 29.47 8.88 0.67%
Palantir (PLTR) 447.04B 159.00 45.74 0.00%
Oracle (ORCL) 387.73B 20.10 6.27 1.56%
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 279.76B 855.00 10.18 0.00%
CrowdStrike (CRWD) 232.83B 5,983.95 45.64 0.00%

StockVane 追踪范围内同行业的其他公司。

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ 合理价值44.30 经济护城河None 不确定性High

当前股价低于晨星合理价值估算21.4%。

合理价值

Though Calix Inc appears cheap due to heavy downward pressure in the past year, we have capped its rating at 3 stars to factor in the possibility that it represents a value trap. The stock currently trades at a 22% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $44.30 per share; however, caution is warranted due to this estimate's high uncertainty rating.

The firm's profitability bolsters our valuation estimate. Highly profitable companies are often more resilient in recessions and are likely to generate stronger future cash flows for shareholders. For example, the firm's enterprise value to free cash flow ratio of 14.3 sits in the bottom 30% globally. This can be a sign of operational efficiency and potential for the company to fund growth, pay dividends, or reduce debt without needing additional capital. We believe this is a sign that shares could be undervalued.

On a different note, the firm's valuation metrics are potentially concerning. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's enterprise value to market value ratio of 0.9, a core component of valuation, lies in the bottom 30% compared with global peers. The market value of equity makes up a large fraction of enterprise value, indicating that shares have sharply risen, or that the company has a "lazy" balance sheet that is underleveraged. Despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, this characteristic is a negative attribute.

经济护城河

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, this business is unlikely to consistently outearn its cost of capital without structural protection from competition. However, its financial health score is strong, suggesting that the company should be well positioned to weather tough times.

作者:Quantitative Equity Report

报价时间 2026-10-16 19:30:05 · 仅供参考,不构成投资建议,也未考虑您的具体情况。

凯利克斯 讨论区 0 条评论

发表评论