费罗维亚尔

DriveTN, in which Ferrovial owns a 65% stake, has reached commercial close with the Tennessee Department of Transportation on a 50-year concession to build and operate four managed lanes on Interstate 24 between Nashville and Murfreesboro.

The bottom line: We raise our Morningstar Uncertainty Rating for wide-moat Ferrovial to Medium from Low but leave all other forecasts and ratings unchanged, including our Exemplary capital allocation Rating and EUR 80 ($91) fair value estimate. At current levels, we think shares are attractive. We disagree with the "guilty-until-proven-innocent" position that market participants have taken following the concession win, where DriveTN offered over three times the concession value of the next best bid. That said, until Ferrovial can disclose details at financial close (no later than July 2027), we expect the elevated uncertainty to be an overhang on the stock, given that other sell-side estimates point to an equity internal rate of return well short of the level Ferrovial implies it has underwritten the investment at.

Big picture: We are more concerned about rising bond yields and elevated fuel prices in North America for Ferrovial’s assets, given the long duration of the assets and affordability weighing on demand for managed lanes.

Coming up: JFK New Terminal One is due to begin operations in the first quarter of 2027, the I-285 East outcome is expected later this month, and third-quarter results are due on Oct. 28. An I-285 East win later this month could revive fears about bidding discipline, but we believe Ferrovial subsidiary Cintra’s operating data on capture rates and above-cap pricing give it an edge that rivals lack, at least partially explaining the surprising delta between bids.

Investors are treating the bid as guilty until proven innocent, which we think is unfair to a team with an Exemplary capital allocation rating and an industry-leading US managed lanes record. Importantly, we don't think this is a bet-the-house project; assuming one-third equity funding, as on past managed lanes, Ferrovial's 65% share of the build and $1.5 billion upfront payment is about $2.3 billion. If most of the concession value must also be equity funded before operations, as some sell-side models assume, the check could rise to $5.5 billion-$6.3 billion, which is still below the roughly EUR 7 billion of market cap value lost. We understand that equity is typically injected at the end of construction, implying payments from the early 2030s. Management says it will fund it from project dividends and modest holding-company debt within its BBB rating, with no equity raise or core disposals, and that the market is overestimating the equity requirement.

The bear case rests on the $24.8 billion concession value, over three times rival bids. Ferrovial cannot detail it under an NDA until financial close (deadline July 2027), including whether it is nominal or NPV. The payment schedule, debt mix, and federal TIFIA loan size are not yet finalized, as is normal between signing the contract and locking in financing. DriveTN is shielded meanwhile, with TDOT bearing all base rate risk (moves in benchmark yields) and 85% of margin risk (credit spread movement) on bonds, plus TIFIA amount and rate risk. In plain terms, if borrowing costs rise before the loans are signed, the TDOT absorbs most of it.

We are more concerned about the macro; the US 10-year yield touched 5.35% on Oct. 7, its highest since 2002, versus 4.69% on award day. That lifts the rate at which the market values long-duration assets and raises funding costs. Gasoline prices average $4.37 a gallon, up 39% year on year, with diesel up faster, a risk to discretionary managed lane trips. While the I-24 earns nothing until 2034, these pressures hit the existing portfolio now.

Price aside, we think the I-24 asset is attractive. Nashville's metro population grew 2% a year and real GDP 4.6% a year over the past decade, with income 9% above the US average. The corridor carries 150,000-190,000 vehicles daily, with 36-minute peak delays. Heavy vehicles make up 12%-16% of traffic because two freight flows overlap. First, Nashville is one of only six US cities where three interstates converge, and I-24 links Atlanta and the Southeast with St. Louis and Chicago. Secondly, the stretch from La Vergne through Smyrna to Murfreesboro is one of the region's densest logistics clusters. Distribution centers for Amazon, Cardinal Health, General Mills, and Ingram sit alongside Nissan's Smyrna plant. Companies cluster here for interstate access, available land between Nashville and Murfreesboro, and reach, with 75% of the US market within a two-day drive.

The pricing framework is even more favorable than at Ferrovia's Dallas-Fort Worth managed lanes. Tolls can rise above the $1.6 per mile soft cap once traffic passes 1,500 passenger car equivalents per lane, per hour, against 1,800 at DFW. The trigger is checked every five minutes on each segment, and once hit, it also lifts pricing on the segment upstream. The cap escalates annually from 2025 at the greater of 2.5% or the average of Tennessee GDP growth, US CPI, and 3%. DriveTN keeps all revenue up to $3.2 per mile, a threshold that escalates on the same basis, and heavy truck multiples reach 8 times the car toll versus 5 times at DFW.

DriveTN's design connects 15 interchanges versus TDOT's reference design of seven, putting 95% of trips in scope. Three possible extensions totaling 24 miles are excluded from the bid but carry a right of first refusal. Management has indicated the congested northern leg into downtown is first in line, echoing NTE 35W's extensions.

All said, we expect noise to persist. A losing consortium sued TDOT on 5 October for contract records, but says it is not trying to stop the project. An I-285 East win later this month, where Transurban exited the consortium, could revive fears about bidding discipline, but we believe Cintra's operating data on capture rates and above-cap pricing give it an edge that rivals lack, at least partially explaining the surprising delta between bids.

Our fair value estimate for Ferrovial is $91 per share. We triangulate our model-driven estimate with our sum-of-the-parts calculation, which better captures the long-duration—though finite—cash flows associated with build-operate-transfer infrastructure concessions.

Ferrovial’s 48.29% stake in 407 ETR contributes just under half of our fair value estimate. We expect revenue growth to moderate from 2027, after strong double-digit revenue-per-trip growth in 2024-26, partly a catch-up from a four-year pandemic-era rate freeze. Over its 25-year history, the asset has shown it can implement above-inflation average tariff increases without hurting traffic. We forecast average revenue per trip to grow 1.5% above our 2.3% Canada CPI forecast for the remainder of the concession. Toll increases drive most of our growth, but traffic should also rise with GTA population growth and return-to-office trends. Our 4.9% revenue CAGR to 2098 reflects these traffic and toll forecasts, ahead of Ferrovial’s own 2018 estimates due to higher inflation expectations and toll hikes we think achievable. EBITDA margins should expand beyond 84% given mostly fixed operating costs. We forecast maintenance capital expenditures averaging 2.1% of sales, in line with 2018 disclosures. We use 5.1% asset-level WACC (50/50 debt/equity, 7% cost of equity, 4.33% cost of debt).

The US Managed Lanes contribute 38% to our fair value estimate. We view the location of Ferrovial’s toll roads very favorably: Dallas-Fort Worth, Charlotte, and Northern Virginia all boast affluent and growing catchment areas that supports long-term pricing power. We forecast revenue per transaction to at least double in real terms over the remaining life, implying toll growth 2.0%-2.5% above our 2.3% US CPI assumption, with 5%-6% revenue CAGR and margin benefits from operating leverage. Our base case excludes new concession awards. We use the 6.5% group WACC value these assets.

Ferrovial’s 49% stake in JFK's New Terminal One, or NTO, contributes 6.6% of our fair value. The terminal is set to open in early 2027; Ferrovial has disclosed limited operating economics, so our estimates rely peer comparisons and bond disclosures. We’re constructive on a quick ramp given the shortage of wide-body aircraft gates at JFK and the agreements already secured with around 32 carriers, including CPI +1% annual escalators on cost-per-enplanement, or CPE, with further repricing scope after contracts expire. We estimate an initial CPE of $85 (raising this to $100 increases group fair value 2%), with CPE contributing 75% of NTO revenue and the balance from other aeronautical/nonaeronautical sources. We estimate an 80% midcycle EBITDA margin, with PANYNJ fees below this line. We use a 5.2% asset-level WACC, with higher debt weighting offsetting a 9% COE estimate reflecting the projects nascency.

The balance of our fair value estimate comprises Ferrovial’s construction businesses (Ferrovial Construction, Budimex, and Webber), Energy segment, Spanish and Portuguese toll roads, and its Dalaman Airport stake. We use a 4 times EV/EBITDA multiple for Ferrovial Construction and Webber, and we mark-to-market Ferrovial’s 51% stake in listed Budimex. We also mark-to-market Ferrovial’s 20% direct stake in IRB Infrastructure Developers and add the book value of Ferrovial’s stake in IRB Infrastructure Trust, which owns a portfolio of 14 toll road concessions in India. We value Ferrovial’s legacy Spanish and Portuguese toll roads using a 4 times EV/EBITDA multiple and add its 60% stake in Dalaman Airport at book value. We then add the holding company’s net cash balance—after stripping out Budimex’s share—to the equity value.

We assign a wide moat rating to Ferrovial. We believe its unique portfolio and pipeline of predominantly lightly regulated infrastructure concessions benefit from both efficient scale and intangible asset moat sources.

We believe transport infrastructure concessions have the potential to benefit from efficient scale and intangible moat sources. When a catchment areas demand is being adequately serviced by an incumbent, it becomes both economically irrational and often physically impossible to duplicate the piece of infrastructure, which characterizes an efficient scale moat. The exclusive right to charge for use (that is, the concession) is an exemplar regulatory intangible asset.

Project IRRs, not return on invested capital, better captures lifetime economic profit for concessions, since they carry a large amortizing intangible asset that depresses early ROIC and inflates it later. Accordingly, we look for positive net present values and above weighted average cost of capital IRRs when investments are made. As a rule of thumb, Ferrovial aims to underwrite infrastructure investments with a post-tax equity IRR in the double digits, with the exact level contingent on the project's complexity. Ferrovial does not disclose its asset-level IRR estimates anymore, but since it last did in 2018, its key assets, 407 ETR, North Tarrant Express 35W, and LBJ Express lanes, have all progressed ahead of those forecasts.

Ferrovial’s stake in 407 ETR earns a wide moat. The 99-year concession, awarded in 1999, grants the exclusive right to toll, collect on, and enforce use of the highway—a right that cannot be replicated, since no competing route can be built through the same corridor. This exclusivity is compounded by a toll formula that lets pricing power outrun inflation: minimum increases tracked CPI +2% until 2014 and 100% of CPI since, with full discretion to raise tolls further providing traffic exceeds set thresholds. Below-threshold traffic instead triggers a Schedule 22 payment to the government equal to 2 times the annual segment tariff revenue times the percentage of traffic under the threshold. Inelastic demand has worked in the concessionaire’s favor, allowing peak toll rates to rise 8.5 times since 1999 (8.6% CAGR) even after a toll freeze from 2020-24.

The efficient scale moat rests on 407 ETR’s position traversing the congested and growing Greater Toronto Area. The GTA’s affluent population is set to grow 22% by 2051, while the main free alternatives (Highways 401, 403, and the QEW) are already severely congested at peak times; a Steer study estimates commuters can save up to two hours a day by using the 407 ETR. Planned expansions to alternative routes are unlikely to close this gap, since population growth should absorb the added capacity. Vehicle kilometers traveled grew at a 1.9% CAGR from 2010-20, just behind our GTA GDP per capita growth estimate but far steadier, reflecting toll roads’ resilience through downturns.

Ferrovial’s US managed lanes earn the same wide moat and for the same reasons as 407 ETR: an exclusive, unreplicable right to toll, paired with inelastic demand from commuters facing congested free alternatives. The Texpress network (LBJ Express, NTE, NTE 35W) in Dallas-Fort Worth, I-77 in Charlotte, and I-66 in Northern Virginia all serve growing affluent populations ahead of national average, reinforcing demand as concessions run to at least 2061. We expect all routes to raise real toll rates at least twofold over the remainder of the concession and estimate all have a positive net present value, using our group 6.5% WACC estimate.

New Terminal One will earn a wide moat once it opens in early 2027. Ferrovial owns 49% of the 35-year concession to build, operate, and maintain what aims to be the highest quality terminal serving the New York City metro area. JFK is slot-constrained and demand-rich, and a greenfield competitor is effectively impossible given airspace, land, and regulatory limits. Once complete, the terminal will house one-third of JFK’s wide-body gates; with 32 carrier agreements already signed, including anchors Etihad, Air France, and Qatar Airways, we expect it to reach capacity quickly. The terminal will charge an entirely unregulated cost-per-enplanement fee, which is expected to generate around three-quarters of the concessions revenue. We understand contracts with carriers are 5-15 years in duration, including a CPI +1% annual adjustment, and each renewal is an opportunity to set them higher. Switching costs reinforce this, given once a carrier has built out lounges, ground handling, and connectivity at the terminal, relocating means rebuilding all of it elsewhere.

We award no moat to Ferrovial’s construction businesses, which compete with EPC firms like Vinci, Bouygues, ACS Group/Hochtief, Kiewit, and Skanska on tendered contracts. Generally, we do not award EPC firms economic moats due to intense competition, significant customer power, and the commoditized nature of many projects, even the most critical and complex. The result is thin margins with no buffer against continuous execution risk—cost overruns from exogenous shocks such as bad weather or volatile raw material prices routinely eat what little margins exists. Therefore, firms struggle to generate durable excess returns on capital over the cycle.

This doesn’t affect our overall rating for the group, however, since the construction businesses give Ferrovial a platform that can improve bid competitiveness, delivery control, and risk management on infrastructure developments.

The 407 ETR has proven it can increase earnings well ahead of inflation, and the concession still has 72 years remaining.

Ferrovial’s 49% equity stake in New Terminal One at JFK should quickly reach full capacity once it opens, given its focus on international wide-body aircraft gates.

There’s still ample runway for capital redeployment in North America toll roads, with Ferrovial in the race to build and operate new managed lanes in Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina.

Construction businesses can face cost overruns resulting from factors beyond their control, such as weather.

If investments are underwritten with overly optimistic estimates, projects can become insolvent due to the high levels of debt carried in the SPVs, as was the case with the Indiana Toll Road (2014) and the State Highway-130 (2012).

Competition for infrastructure assets could rise in the coming years as private capital allocations increase.