Head to head
Ads-Tec Energy vs Vertiv Holdings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ADSE · VRT
ADSE
Ads-Tec Energy
9.39-3.10%
1-year price shape — -16% over the period
Quant Rating F · 19/100
vs
VRT
Vertiv Holdings
249.32+1.15%
1-year price shape — +55% over the period
Quant Rating D · 83/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Vertiv Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. Vertiv Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (83); Vertiv Holdings has done best over the past year (+55%); Vertiv Holdings pays the highest dividend yield.
| ADSE | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Last price | 9.39 | 249.32 |
| Change today | -3.10% | +1.15% |
| 1-year return | -15.6% | +55.3% |
| Market cap | $706.00M | $95.99B |
| 52-week range | 9.14 – 13.50 | 147.72 – 379.76 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -6.17 | 56.41 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 71st | 34th |
| P/B | 80.95 | 20.18 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -1.10 | 3.41 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-82.48M | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | -- | $11.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | +24.1% |
| Gross margin | -67.8% | 38.0% |
| Operating margin | -214.5% | 19.4% |
| Net margin | -339.4% | 15.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | -- | $2.92B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 90.4% | 83.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 18 sell | 33 buy / 10 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.1% | 3.7% |
| Analyst consensus | -- | 100% buy (16) |
| Analyst price target | -- | $342 (+37%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | F (19) | D (83) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 302 | 34,000 |
| Founded | 2021 | 1946 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.