Head to head
BP PLC vs Exxon Mobil
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: BP · XOM
BP
BP PLC
46.25-0.24%
1-year price shape — +42% over the period
Quant Rating B · 78/100
vs
XOM
Exxon Mobil
168.94+0.26%
1-year price shape — +54% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Exxon Mobil edges it on the scoreable measures. Exxon Mobil has the highest Quant Rating (83); Exxon Mobil has done best over the past year (+54%); Exxon Mobil trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| BP | XOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Last price | 46.25 | 168.94 |
| Change today | -0.24% | +0.26% |
| 1-year return | +41.8% | +54.0% |
| Market cap | $119.11B | $694.67B |
| 52-week range | 31.12 – 47.14 | 107.28 – 174.09 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 22.10 | 21.74 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 70th | 89th |
| P/B | 2.04 | 2.68 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 2.42% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.02 | 6.70 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $51.51M | $27.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217.16B | $361.06B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +48.2% | +44.1% |
| Gross margin | 20.0% | 20.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| Net margin | 2.5% | 9.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $16.14B | $30.55B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 80.9% | 66.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 25 buy / 21 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 38% buy / 50% hold / 12% sell (8) | 44% buy / 56% hold (16) |
| Analyst price target | $49 (+5%) | $172 (+2%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (78) | B (83) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 93,700 | 57,900 |
| Founded | 1908 | -- |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.