Head to head
Crown Holdings vs Smurfit WestRock
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CCK · SW
CCK
Crown Holdings
107.10-0.55%
1-year price shape — +18% over the period
Quant Rating C · 57/100
vs
SW
Smurfit WestRock
41.29-2.60%
1-year price shape — +5% over the period
Quant Rating D · 47/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Crown Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. Crown Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (57); Crown Holdings has done best over the past year (+18%); Crown Holdings trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CCK | SW | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Packaging & Containers | -- |
| Last price | 107.10 | 41.29 |
| Change today | -0.55% | -2.60% |
| 1-year return | +17.6% | +4.6% |
| Market cap | $11.65B | $21.66B |
| 52-week range | 88.12 – 122.91 | 31.79 – 51.52 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 15.41 | 43.93 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 32nd | 78th |
| P/B | 4.06 | 1.20 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 4.28% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.38 | 1.33 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $693.89M | $697.62M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.26B | $31.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +16.5% | +1.1% |
| Gross margin | 21.0% | 17.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.6% | 5.8% |
| Net margin | 5.9% | 1.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $1.20B | $1.02B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 101.9% | 102.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 26 buy / 22 sell | 50 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.4% | 4.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 75% buy / 25% hold (12) | 100% buy (9) |
| Analyst price target | $133 (+24%) | $59 (+43%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (57) | D (47) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 23,000 | 97,000 |
| Founded | 1892 | 2017 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.