Head to head
Daktronics vs Amphenol
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: DAKT · APH
DAKT
Daktronics
17.80-0.06%
1-year price shape — -8% over the period
Quant Rating D · 49/100
vs
APH
Amphenol
87.17-0.43%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Amphenol edges it on the scoreable measures. Amphenol has the highest Quant Rating (79); Amphenol has done best over the past year (+41%); Amphenol pays the highest dividend yield.
| DAKT | APH | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
| Last price | 17.80 | 87.17 |
| Change today | -0.06% | -0.43% |
| 1-year return | -8.4% | +41.4% |
| Market cap | $856.05M | $214.96B |
| 52-week range | 16.77 – 28.27 | 58.82 – 89.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 17.98 | 43.59 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 39th | 84th |
| P/B | 2.69 | 13.88 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.53% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.92 | 1.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $44.25M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $854.30M | $29.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.1% | +55.0% |
| Gross margin | 27.6% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 27.7% |
| Net margin | 5.7% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $39.80M | $4.71B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 75.9% | 97.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 35 buy / 12 sell | 24 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 91% buy / 9% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $31 (+74%) | $101 (+15%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (49) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,693 | 170,000 |
| Founded | 1968 | 1932 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.