Head to head
Evolution Metals & Technologie vs BHP Group Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: EMAT · BHP
EMAT
Evolution Metals & Technologie
1.75-8.85%
1-year price shape — not enough history yet
Quant Rating C · 0/100
vs
BHP
BHP Group Ltd
85.22-2.05%
1-year price shape — +61% over the period
Quant Rating B · 86/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
BHP Group Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. BHP Group Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (86); BHP Group Ltd pays the highest dividend yield; BHP Group Ltd earns the most per share.
| EMAT | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Other Industrial Metals & Mining |
| Last price | 1.75 | 85.22 |
| Change today | -8.85% | -2.05% |
| 1-year return | -- | +60.9% |
| Market cap | $1.09B | $216.58B |
| 52-week range | 1.72 – 24.09 | 50.08 – 96.60 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -15.91 | 22.05 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 23rd | 98th |
| P/B | -58.33 | 4.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.12% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.11 | 3.86 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-68.40M | $9.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.52M | -- |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| Gross margin | -9.0% | 75.6% |
| Operating margin | -530.6% | 43.4% |
| Net margin | -11241.1% | 16.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-27.04M | -- |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 2.4% | 44.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 1 buy / 1 sell | 5 buy / 1 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 100% hold (2) |
| Analyst price target | $11 (+543%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (0) | B (86) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | -- | 84,309 |
| Founded | -- | 1885 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.