Head to head
Graham vs GE Vernova
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: GHM · GEV
GHM
Graham
83.09-1.48%
1-year price shape — +52% over the period
Quant Rating D · 51/100
vs
GEV
GE Vernova
1,018.27+2.12%
1-year price shape — +65% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
GE Vernova edges it on the scoreable measures. GE Vernova has the highest Quant Rating (88); GE Vernova has done best over the past year (+65%); GE Vernova trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| GHM | GEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Specialty Industrial Machinery |
| Last price | 83.09 | 1,018.27 |
| Change today | -1.48% | +2.12% |
| 1-year return | +51.8% | +64.9% |
| Market cap | $975.23M | $271.20B |
| 52-week range | 52.57 – 125.82 | 529.18 – 1,195.94 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 80.67 | 29.19 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 83rd | 20th |
| P/B | 5.07 | 22.68 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.12 | 17.69 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $13.15M | $4.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $261.15M | $41.37B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +28.6% | +21.9% |
| Gross margin | 23.3% | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 4.5% | 23.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-6.12M | $12.44B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 95.1% | 81.0% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 32 buy / 17 sell | 35 buy / 15 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 7.7% | 3.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 75% buy / 25% hold (4) | 89% buy / 6% hold / 6% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $128 (+54%) | $1,251 (+23%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (51) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 732 | 78,000 |
| Founded | 1983 | 2021 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.