Head to head
HighPeak Energy vs ConocoPhillips
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: HPK · COP
HPK
HighPeak Energy
8.64+1.41%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating B · 80/100
vs
COP
ConocoPhillips
133.01+2.44%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ConocoPhillips edges it on the scoreable measures. ConocoPhillips has done best over the past year (+41%); ConocoPhillips pays the highest dividend yield; ConocoPhillips earns the most per share.
| HPK | COP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Last price | 8.64 | 133.01 |
| Change today | +1.41% | +2.44% |
| 1-year return | +18.5% | +40.6% |
| Market cap | $1.09B | $159.78B |
| 52-week range | 3.85 – 9.13 | 82.95 – 141.62 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -12.71 | 17.59 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 0th | 81st |
| P/B | 0.70 | 2.45 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.48% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.13 | 6.35 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $16.44M | $7.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $893.82M | $63.35B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +25.8% | +36.8% |
| Gross margin | 21.5% | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 21.9% |
| Net margin | -9.8% | 14.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-7.88M | $10.06B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 101.0% | 86.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 29 buy / 5 sell | 21 buy / 27 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.2% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (1) | 84% buy / 16% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $10 (+16%) | $149 (+12%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (80) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 50 | 9,900 |
| Founded | 2019 | 1875 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.