Head to head
Lincoln International vs Morgan Stanley
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LCLN · MS
LCLN
Lincoln International
24.62+1.11%
1-year price shape — not enough history yet
Quant Rating C · 0/100
vs
MS
Morgan Stanley
190.02+1.38%
1-year price shape — +24% over the period
Quant Rating D · 65/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Morgan Stanley edges it on the scoreable measures. Morgan Stanley has the highest Quant Rating (65); Morgan Stanley pays the highest dividend yield; Morgan Stanley earns the most per share.
| LCLN | MS | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| Last price | 24.62 | 190.02 |
| Change today | +1.11% | +1.38% |
| 1-year return | -- | +24.4% |
| Market cap | $857.93M | $298.44B |
| 52-week range | 19.99 – 27.55 | 148.51 – 230.98 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 4.07 | 15.35 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 63rd | 46th |
| P/B | 6.38 | 2.80 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.09 | 10.21 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $3.14M | $16.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $665.36M | $73.05B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +50.8% | +27.4% |
| Gross margin | 29.8% | -- |
| Operating margin | -3.8% | -- |
| Net margin | -5.5% | 26.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $176.86M | $-18.58B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 80.2% | 86.9% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 32 buy / 10 sell | 23 buy / 27 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.9% | 0.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 20% buy / 80% hold (5) | 53% buy / 47% hold (15) |
| Analyst price target | $27 (+8%) | $232 (+22%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (0) | D (65) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | -- | 83,000 |
| Founded | -- | 1924 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.