Head to head
Manulife Financial vs MetLife
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: MFC · MET
MFC
Manulife Financial
41.67-2.94%
1-year price shape — +34% over the period
Quant Rating B · 74/100
vs
MET
MetLife
95.78-1.42%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating C · 61/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Manulife Financial edges it on the scoreable measures. Manulife Financial has the highest Quant Rating (74); Manulife Financial has done best over the past year (+34%); Manulife Financial trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| MFC | MET | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 41.67 | 95.78 |
| Change today | -2.94% | -1.42% |
| 1-year return | +34.4% | +19.0% |
| Market cap | $68.93B | $60.87B |
| 52-week range | 30.29 – 44.96 | 66.41 – 100.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 16.10 | 18.35 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 90th | 63rd |
| P/B | 2.11 | 2.22 |
| Dividend yield | 3.13% | 2.40% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 2.15 | 4.71 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $3.56B | $2.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $57.48B | $77.67B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +27.8% | +9.9% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 10.8% | 4.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $30.95B | $15.56B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 57.4% | 94.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 10 buy / 0 sell | 45 buy / 5 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.5% | 1.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 83% buy / 17% hold (6) | 92% buy / 8% hold (12) |
| Analyst price target | $50 (+19%) | $108 (+13%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (74) | C (61) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 27,000 | 46,000 |
| Founded | 1887 | 1868 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.