Head to head
ODDITY Tech vs Procter & Gamble
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ODD · PG
ODD
ODDITY Tech
21.11+7.98%
1-year price shape — -59% over the period
Quant Rating D · 2/100
vs
PG
Procter & Gamble
151.23+0.42%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating C · 43/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Procter & Gamble edges it on the scoreable measures. Procter & Gamble has the highest Quant Rating (43); Procter & Gamble has done best over the past year (+3%); Procter & Gamble trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| ODD | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 21.11 | 151.23 |
| Change today | +7.98% | +0.42% |
| 1-year return | -59.1% | +3.4% |
| Market cap | $973.69M | $351.26B |
| 52-week range | 9.25 – 52.00 | 134.62 – 164.77 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 95.95 | 22.84 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 100th | 14th |
| P/B | 4.00 | 6.59 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.82% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.80 | 6.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $83.02M | $15.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $679.09M | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -25.1% | +1.5% |
| Gross margin | 70.0% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | -1.1% | 22.7% |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 18.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-40.31M | $15.15B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 83.9% | 71.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 14 buy / 18 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 10.7% | 1.1% |
| Analyst consensus | 62% hold / 38% sell (8) | 59% buy / 41% hold (17) |
| Analyst price target | $14 (-32%) | $161 (+6%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (2) | C (43) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 658 | 104,000 |
| Founded | 2013 | 1837 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.