Head to head
Trilogy Metals vs BHP Group Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: TMQ · BHP
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
2.85-0.18%
1-year price shape — -56% over the period
Quant Rating F · 38/100
vs
BHP
BHP Group Ltd
85.10-0.14%
1-year price shape — +61% over the period
Quant Rating B · 86/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
BHP Group Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. BHP Group Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (86); BHP Group Ltd has done best over the past year (+61%); BHP Group Ltd pays the highest dividend yield.
| TMQ | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Other Industrial Metals & Mining | Other Industrial Metals & Mining |
| Last price | 2.85 | 85.10 |
| Change today | -0.18% | -0.14% |
| 1-year return | -56.2% | +60.9% |
| Market cap | $515.97M | $216.28B |
| 52-week range | 2.79 – 11.29 | 50.08 – 96.60 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -9.81 | 22.02 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 46th | 98th |
| P/B | 4.42 | 4.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.26 | 3.86 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-47.15M | $9.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0 | -- |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| Gross margin | -- | 75.6% |
| Operating margin | -- | 43.4% |
| Net margin | -- | 16.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-5.45M | -- |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 43.4% | 44.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 34 buy / 16 sell | 5 buy / 1 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.2% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (2) | 100% hold (2) |
| Analyst price target | $5 (+74%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | F (38) | B (86) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 8 | 84,309 |
| Founded | 2011 | 1885 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.