Head to head
Ferroglobe vs BHP Group Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: GSM · BHP
GSM
Ferroglobe
4.24+1.07%
1-year price shape — -19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 21/100
vs
BHP
BHP Group Ltd
86.74+2.25%
1-year price shape — +61% over the period
Quant Rating B · 87/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
BHP Group Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. BHP Group Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (87); BHP Group Ltd has done best over the past year (+61%); BHP Group Ltd pays the highest dividend yield.
| GSM | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Other Industrial Metals & Mining |
| Last price | 4.24 | 86.74 |
| Change today | +1.07% | +2.25% |
| 1-year return | -18.7% | +61.3% |
| Market cap | $791.35M | $220.45B |
| 52-week range | 3.07 – 5.66 | 50.08 – 96.60 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -19.25 | 22.45 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 2nd | 98th |
| P/B | 1.10 | 4.46 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 3.07% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.91 | 3.86 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-170.04M | $9.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | -- |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.1% | -- |
| Gross margin | 26.2% | 75.6% |
| Operating margin | -6.9% | 43.4% |
| Net margin | -9.5% | 16.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-12.92M | -- |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 59.5% | 44.7% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 2 buy / 3 sell | 5 buy / 1 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.5% | 0.8% |
| Analyst consensus | -- | 50% buy / 50% hold (2) |
| Analyst price target | -- | $96 (+11%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (21) | B (87) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,920 | 84,309 |
| Founded | 2015 | 1885 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.