Head to head
Ares Management vs Blackrock
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ARES · BLK
ARES
Ares Management
115.75-1.69%
1-year price shape — -19% over the period
Quant Rating D · 19/100
vs
BLK
Blackrock
1,069.63-0.91%
1-year price shape — -7% over the period
Quant Rating D · 30/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Blackrock edges it on the scoreable measures. Blackrock has the highest Quant Rating (30); Blackrock has done best over the past year (-7%); Blackrock trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| ARES | BLK | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Last price | 115.75 | 1,069.63 |
| Change today | -1.69% | -0.91% |
| 1-year return | -18.5% | -6.8% |
| Market cap | $26.33B | $165.65B |
| 52-week range | 92.59 – 173.99 | 907.59 – 1,194.41 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 53.10 | 25.63 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 26th | 75th |
| P/B | 10.50 | 2.88 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 2.05% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.71 | 35.31 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $388.94M | $5.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.99B | $27.30B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.8% | +30.6% |
| Gross margin | 55.8% | 47.2% |
| Operating margin | 18.1% | 33.0% |
| Net margin | -8.2% | 24.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $836.15M | $3.52B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 100.3% | 85.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 16 buy / 34 sell | 35 buy / 14 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 7.1% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 83% buy / 17% hold (12) | 100% buy (13) |
| Analyst price target | $152 (+31%) | $1,333 (+25%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (19) | D (30) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,250 | 24,900 |
| Founded | 1997 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.