Head to head
Bel Fuse-B vs Amphenol
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: BELFB · APH
BELFB
Bel Fuse-B
246.72-5.20%
1-year price shape — +75% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
vs
APH
Amphenol
87.55-1.21%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Amphenol edges it on the scoreable measures. Amphenol trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Amphenol pays the highest dividend yield.
| BELFB | APH | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
| Last price | 246.72 | 87.55 |
| Change today | -5.20% | -1.21% |
| 1-year return | +74.9% | +41.4% |
| Market cap | $3.56B | $215.90B |
| 52-week range | 129.82 – 335.20 | 58.82 – 89.93 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 59.45 | 43.78 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 96th | 84th |
| P/B | 3.92 | 13.94 |
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 0.52% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.90 | 1.67 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $70.75M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $744.09M | $29.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +25.2% | +55.0% |
| Gross margin | 39.5% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 16.5% | 27.7% |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 17.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $73.34M | $4.71B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 100.3% | 97.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 19 buy / 29 sell | 24 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.0% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (6) | 91% buy / 9% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $330 (+34%) | $101 (+15%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (90) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,964 | 170,000 |
| Founded | 1949 | 1932 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.