Head to head
CF Industries Holdings vs Nutrien
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CF · NTR
CF
CF Industries Holdings
114.44-1.36%
1-year price shape — +27% over the period
Quant Rating C · 68/100
vs
NTR
Nutrien
69.97-1.73%
1-year price shape — +19% over the period
Quant Rating C · 61/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
CF Industries Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. CF Industries Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (68); CF Industries Holdings has done best over the past year (+27%); CF Industries Holdings trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CF | NTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Agricultural Inputs | -- |
| Last price | 114.44 | 69.97 |
| Change today | -1.36% | -1.73% |
| 1-year return | +27.0% | +19.2% |
| Market cap | $17.32B | $33.39B |
| 52-week range | 74.33 – 141.66 | 50.05 – 81.99 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 8.49 | 14.16 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 29th | 41st |
| P/B | 3.01 | 1.29 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 3.13% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 8.97 | 4.66 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $1.36B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.74B | $28.21B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.6% | +3.6% |
| Gross margin | 42.5% | 31.0% |
| Operating margin | 39.1% | 14.7% |
| Net margin | 27.1% | 8.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $1.90B | $2.09B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 107.6% | 73.0% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 15 buy / 35 sell | 1 buy / 2 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.5% | 1.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 36% buy / 45% hold / 18% sell (11) | 69% buy / 23% hold / 8% sell (13) |
| Analyst price target | $128 (+12%) | $78 (+11%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (68) | C (61) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,900 | 25,100 |
| Founded | 1946 | 2017 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.