Head to head
C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs United Parcel Service
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CHRW · UPS
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
135.18+0.10%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating D · 41/100
vs
UPS
United Parcel Service
92.29-0.88%
1-year price shape — +14% over the period
Quant Rating D · 55/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
United Parcel Service edges it on the scoreable measures. United Parcel Service has the highest Quant Rating (55); United Parcel Service has done best over the past year (+14%); United Parcel Service trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CHRW | UPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Last price | 135.18 | 92.29 |
| Change today | +0.10% | -0.88% |
| 1-year return | +2.6% | +14.4% |
| Market cap | $15.77B | $78.52B |
| 52-week range | 121.78 – 209.43 | 76.95 – 116.86 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 25.80 | 17.15 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 65th | 64th |
| P/B | 9.69 | 5.21 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 7.11% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.83 | 6.56 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $563.41M | $5.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.00B | $89.93B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +19.3% | +7.6% |
| Gross margin | 8.1% | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 4.9% | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 3.7% | 5.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $617.80M | $5.46B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 105.0% | 64.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 30 buy / 20 sell | 34 buy / 11 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 80% buy / 15% hold / 5% sell (20) | 50% buy / 39% hold / 11% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $203 (+50%) | $116 (+26%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (41) | D (55) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 12,616 | 460,000 |
| Founded | 1905 | 1907 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.