Head to head
Cincinnati Financial vs Chubb Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CINF · CB
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
161.61-0.90%
1-year price shape — -0% over the period
Quant Rating D · 39/100
vs
CB
Chubb Ltd
334.70+0.15%
1-year price shape — +17% over the period
Quant Rating C · 60/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Chubb Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. Chubb Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (60); Chubb Ltd has done best over the past year (+17%); Chubb Ltd earns the most per share.
| CINF | CB | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Last price | 161.61 | 334.70 |
| Change today | -0.90% | +0.15% |
| 1-year return | -0.3% | +17.1% |
| Market cap | $24.80B | $129.13B |
| 52-week range | 146.70 – 193.71 | 262.07 – 364.81 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 7.63 | 11.86 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 21st | 36th |
| P/B | 1.49 | 1.71 |
| Dividend yield | 2.24% | 1.17% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 15.17 | 25.68 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $2.33B | $9.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.95B | $62.28B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +31.6% | +7.2% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 23.8% | 18.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $3.40B | $15.38B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 73.8% | 92.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 25 buy / 25 sell | 13 buy / 37 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.4% | 0.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 40% buy / 60% hold (5) | 39% buy / 50% hold / 11% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $196 (+21%) | $374 (+12%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (39) | C (60) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 5,705 | 45,000 |
| Founded | 1968 | 1882 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.