Head to head
Climb Global Solutions vs TD Synnex
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CLMB · SNX
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
32.76-0.12%
1-year price shape — -4% over the period
Quant Rating D · 52/100
vs
SNX
TD Synnex
271.52-2.46%
1-year price shape — +73% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
TD Synnex edges it on the scoreable measures. TD Synnex has the highest Quant Rating (90); TD Synnex has done best over the past year (+73%); TD Synnex trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CLMB | SNX | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Electronics & Computer Distribution | -- |
| Last price | 32.76 | 271.52 |
| Change today | -0.12% | -2.46% |
| 1-year return | -3.8% | +72.9% |
| Market cap | $611.32M | $21.66B |
| 52-week range | 15.25 – 35.01 | 141.15 – 298.77 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 29.51 | 16.56 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 89th | 40th |
| P/B | 4.89 | 2.33 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 0.69% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.16 | 9.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $21.65M | $793.79M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $711.77M | $75.67B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.4% | +37.7% |
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 6.9% |
| Operating margin | 4.0% | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 1.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $41.00M | $-814.96M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 89.3% | 102.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 17 buy / 33 sell | 13 buy / 37 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.4% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (1) | 86% buy / 14% hold (7) |
| Analyst price target | $30 (-8%) | $342 (+26%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (52) | B (90) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 412 | 28,500 |
| Founded | 1982 | 1980 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.