Head to head
CNH Industrial vs Caterpillar
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CNH · CAT
CNH
CNH Industrial
12.46-6.10%
1-year price shape — +15% over the period
Quant Rating C · 56/100
vs
CAT
Caterpillar
813.83-5.75%
1-year price shape — +69% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Caterpillar edges it on the scoreable measures. Caterpillar has the highest Quant Rating (88); Caterpillar has done best over the past year (+69%); Caterpillar trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CNH | CAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 12.46 | 813.83 |
| Change today | -6.10% | -5.75% |
| 1-year return | +14.8% | +68.7% |
| Market cap | $15.42B | $374.10B |
| 52-week range | 8.91 – 14.46 | 491.03 – 1,071.47 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 47.92 | 35.05 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 96th | 90th |
| P/B | 1.99 | 19.29 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.74% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.41 | 18.81 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $507.47M | $8.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.19B | $74.73B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.0% | +24.0% |
| Gross margin | 30.6% | 32.5% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | 17.5% |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 14.5% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $611.00M | $8.99B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 107.1% | 73.3% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 33 buy / 17 sell | 33 buy / 13 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.2% | 1.8% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 25% hold / 8% sell (12) | 47% buy / 53% hold (15) |
| Analyst price target | $14 (+12%) | $1,010 (+24%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (56) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 34,197 | 118,000 |
| Founded | 2012 | 1925 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.