Head to head
Canadian Natural Resources vs ConocoPhillips
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CNQ · COP
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources
47.50-1.25%
1-year price shape — +51% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
vs
COP
ConocoPhillips
129.84+0.38%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ConocoPhillips edges it on the scoreable measures. ConocoPhillips earns the most per share.
| CNQ | COP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Last price | 47.50 | 129.84 |
| Change today | -1.25% | +0.38% |
| 1-year return | +51.2% | +40.6% |
| Market cap | $97.92B | $155.98B |
| 52-week range | 28.46 – 51.83 | 82.95 – 141.62 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 12.05 | 17.17 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 45th | 81st |
| P/B | 2.98 | 2.39 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 2.54% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 3.62 | 6.35 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $7.46B | $7.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51.40B | $63.35B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +77.9% | +36.8% |
| Gross margin | 26.3% | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 21.9% |
| Net margin | 22.9% | 14.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $9.80B | $10.06B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 81.6% | 86.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 1 sell | 21 buy / 27 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.9% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 44% buy / 56% hold (9) | 84% buy / 16% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $52 (+9%) | $149 (+14%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (83) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 10,750 | 9,900 |
| Founded | 1973 | 1875 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.