Head to head
ConocoPhillips vs Canadian Natural Resources
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: COP · CNQ
COP
ConocoPhillips
133.01+2.44%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
vs
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources
48.47+2.03%
1-year price shape — +51% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ConocoPhillips edges it on the scoreable measures. ConocoPhillips earns the most per share.
| COP | CNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Last price | 133.01 | 48.47 |
| Change today | +2.44% | +2.03% |
| 1-year return | +40.6% | +51.2% |
| Market cap | $159.78B | $99.91B |
| 52-week range | 82.95 – 141.62 | 28.46 – 51.83 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 17.59 | 12.29 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 81st | 45th |
| P/B | 2.45 | 3.04 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 3.52% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 6.35 | 3.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $7.63B | $7.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63.35B | $51.40B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +36.8% | +77.9% |
| Gross margin | 27.7% | 26.3% |
| Operating margin | 21.9% | 23.2% |
| Net margin | 14.6% | 22.9% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $10.06B | $9.80B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 86.2% | 81.6% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 21 buy / 27 sell | 0 buy / 1 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 1.3% | 8.9% |
| Analyst consensus | 84% buy / 16% hold (19) | 44% buy / 56% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | $149 (+12%) | $52 (+7%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (79) | B (83) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 9,900 | 10,750 |
| Founded | 1875 | 1973 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.