Head to head
Crescent Energy vs ConocoPhillips
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CRGY · COP
CRGY
Crescent Energy
13.47-1.10%
1-year price shape — +54% over the period
Quant Rating B · 84/100
vs
COP
ConocoPhillips
129.84+0.38%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ConocoPhillips edges it on the scoreable measures. ConocoPhillips trades cheapest on trailing earnings; ConocoPhillips earns the most per share.
| CRGY | COP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Last price | 13.47 | 129.84 |
| Change today | -1.10% | +0.38% |
| 1-year return | +54.1% | +40.6% |
| Market cap | $4.45B | $155.98B |
| 52-week range | 7.46 – 15.47 | 82.95 – 141.62 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 168.38 | 17.17 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 99th | 81st |
| P/B | 0.86 | 2.39 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 2.54% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.54 | 6.35 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $178.42M | $7.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.31B | $63.35B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +55.3% | +36.8% |
| Gross margin | 80.6% | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 24.4% | 21.9% |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 14.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $544.81M | $10.06B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 92.7% | 86.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 33 buy / 15 sell | 21 buy / 27 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 9.8% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 83% buy / 17% hold (12) | 84% buy / 16% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $18 (+34%) | $149 (+14%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (84) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,066 | 9,900 |
| Founded | 2021 | 1875 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.