Head to head
Critical Metals vs BHP Group Ltd
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CRML · BHP
CRML
Critical Metals
7.06-4.08%
1-year price shape — -30% over the period
Quant Rating D · 48/100
vs
BHP
BHP Group Ltd
85.22-2.05%
1-year price shape — +61% over the period
Quant Rating B · 86/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
BHP Group Ltd edges it on the scoreable measures. BHP Group Ltd has the highest Quant Rating (86); BHP Group Ltd has done best over the past year (+61%); BHP Group Ltd pays the highest dividend yield.
| CRML | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Other Industrial Metals & Mining | Other Industrial Metals & Mining |
| Last price | 7.06 | 85.22 |
| Change today | -4.08% | -2.05% |
| 1-year return | -29.5% | +60.9% |
| Market cap | $1.04B | $216.58B |
| 52-week range | 5.12 – 32.15 | 50.08 – 96.60 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -3.78 | 22.05 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 39th | 98th |
| P/B | 3.02 | 4.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.12% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -1.87 | 3.86 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-274.88M | $9.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| Gross margin | -- | 75.6% |
| Operating margin | -- | 43.4% |
| Net margin | -- | 16.7% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 61.5% | 44.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 7 sell | 5 buy / 1 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 17.6% | 0.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% hold (3) | 100% hold (2) |
| Analyst price target | $15 (+117%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (48) | B (86) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 5 | 84,309 |
| Founded | -- | 1885 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.