Head to head
Carlisle Companies vs Trane Technologies
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CSL · TT
CSL
Carlisle Companies
318.22-2.31%
1-year price shape — -1% over the period
Quant Rating D · 37/100
vs
TT
Trane Technologies
467.27-1.91%
1-year price shape — +11% over the period
Quant Rating C · 52/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Trane Technologies edges it on the scoreable measures. Trane Technologies has the highest Quant Rating (52); Trane Technologies has done best over the past year (+11%).
| CSL | TT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Building Products & Equipment | Building Products & Equipment |
| Last price | 318.22 | 467.27 |
| Change today | -2.31% | -1.91% |
| 1-year return | -0.8% | +11.5% |
| Market cap | $12.64B | $102.81B |
| 52-week range | 290.64 – 428.80 | 345.62 – 504.68 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 18.25 | 35.37 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 39th | 83rd |
| P/B | 7.81 | 11.92 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 0.85% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 17.12 | 12.98 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $679.91M | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.10B | $22.21B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.3% | +10.6% |
| Gross margin | 35.3% | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | 19.9% | 17.9% |
| Net margin | 14.2% | 13.3% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $866.60M | $3.55B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 103.9% | 90.0% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 36 buy / 14 sell | 18 buy / 32 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.1% | 1.5% |
| Analyst consensus | 57% buy / 43% hold (7) | 80% buy / 20% hold (10) |
| Analyst price target | $424 (+33%) | $545 (+17%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (37) | C (52) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 5,900 | 44,000 |
| Founded | 1917 | 2009 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.