Head to head
Curtiss-Wright vs SpaceX
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CW · SPCX
CW
Curtiss-Wright
509.10-8.00%
1-year price shape — -6% over the period
Quant Rating D · 29/100
vs
SPCX
SpaceX
167.60-2.51%
1-year price shape — not enough history yet
Quant Rating C · 0/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Curtiss-Wright edges it on the scoreable measures. Curtiss-Wright has the highest Quant Rating (29); Curtiss-Wright pays the highest dividend yield; Curtiss-Wright earns the most per share.
| CW | SPCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Last price | 509.10 | 167.60 |
| Change today | -8.00% | -2.51% |
| 1-year return | -5.6% | -- |
| Market cap | $18.80B | $2.21T |
| 52-week range | 502.31 – 807.77 | 104.83 – 225.64 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 35.04 | -248.30 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 73rd | 6th |
| P/B | 6.79 | 17.36 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 12.87 | -0.38 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $475.35M | $-4.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.65B | $20.65B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.4% | +91.9% |
| Gross margin | 37.7% | 51.9% |
| Operating margin | 18.9% | -14.9% |
| Net margin | 14.8% | -38.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $625.29M | $-32.52B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 86.5% | 29.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 25 buy / 25 sell | 5 buy / 5 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% hold (6) | 87% buy / 7% hold / 7% sell (30) |
| Analyst price target | $762 (+50%) | $245 (+46%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (29) | C (0) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 9,100 | 22,000 |
| Founded | 1929 | 2002 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.