Head to head
Sprinklr vs SAP SE
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: CXM · SAP
CXM
Sprinklr
5.19+0.58%
1-year price shape — -31% over the period
Quant Rating E · 9/100
vs
SAP
SAP SE
210.13-0.16%
1-year price shape — -22% over the period
Quant Rating D · 17/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
SAP SE edges it on the scoreable measures. SAP SE has the highest Quant Rating (17); SAP SE has done best over the past year (-22%); SAP SE trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| CXM | SAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Last price | 5.19 | 210.13 |
| Change today | +0.58% | -0.16% |
| 1-year return | -31.2% | -21.9% |
| Market cap | $1.20B | $242.53B |
| 52-week range | 4.72 – 8.28 | 144.97 – 276.54 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 51.90 | 28.10 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 72nd | 35th |
| P/B | 2.32 | 4.84 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.09 | 6.83 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $20.90M | $7.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $872.88M | $38.19B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.8% | +9.4% |
| Gross margin | 65.6% | 72.8% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 26.7% |
| Net margin | 2.7% | 20.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $110.38M | $8.73B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 81.4% | 47.0% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 15 buy / 35 sell | 0 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.1% | 0.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 17% buy / 67% hold / 17% sell (6) | 100% buy (7) |
| Analyst price target | $8 (+46%) | $230 (+9%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (9) | D (17) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 3,258 | 111,397 |
| Founded | 2009 | 1972 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.