Head to head
Denison Mines vs Cameco
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: DNN · CCJ
DNN
Denison Mines
2.56-5.54%
1-year price shape — -10% over the period
Quant Rating D · 28/100
vs
CCJ
Cameco
89.07-4.25%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating D · 45/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Cameco edges it on the scoreable measures. Cameco has the highest Quant Rating (45); Cameco has done best over the past year (+3%); Cameco pays the highest dividend yield.
| DNN | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Uranium |
| Last price | 2.56 | 89.07 |
| Change today | -5.54% | -4.25% |
| 1-year return | -10.2% | +3.2% |
| Market cap | $2.32B | $38.79B |
| 52-week range | 2.20 – 4.43 | 77.54 – 135.24 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -11.80 | 156.81 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 48th | 72nd |
| P/B | 11.43 | 7.75 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.17 | 0.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-152.08M | $412.45M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.09M | $3.47B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -43.6% | -7.2% |
| Gross margin | -6.7% | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | -2100.7% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | -6732.7% | 10.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-167.06M | $555.92M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 59.4% | 65.9% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 0 buy / 33 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 10.0% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (5) | 89% buy / 11% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | $4 (+67%) | $125 (+41%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (28) | D (45) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 95 | 3,082 |
| Founded | 1997 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.