Head to head
Dole plc vs Archer Daniels Midland
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: DOLE · ADM
DOLE
Dole plc
12.80+0.63%
1-year price shape — -1% over the period
Quant Rating D · 37/100
vs
ADM
Archer Daniels Midland
81.34-1.06%
1-year price shape — +33% over the period
Quant Rating B · 75/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Archer Daniels Midland edges it on the scoreable measures. Archer Daniels Midland has the highest Quant Rating (75); Archer Daniels Midland has done best over the past year (+33%); Archer Daniels Midland earns the most per share.
| DOLE | ADM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 12.80 | 81.34 |
| Change today | +0.63% | -1.06% |
| 1-year return | -0.8% | +33.2% |
| Market cap | $1.21B | $39.20B |
| 52-week range | 12.22 – 16.27 | 54.00 – 88.75 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 20.65 | 22.22 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 64th | 77th |
| P/B | 0.91 | 1.66 |
| Dividend yield | 2.66% | 2.53% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.53 | 2.23 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $50.06M | $1.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.49B | $82.10B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.9% | +7.2% |
| Gross margin | 7.3% | 6.9% |
| Operating margin | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Net margin | 0.6% | 2.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $83.30M | $1.68B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 82.5% | 88.8% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 6 buy / 0 sell | 48 buy / 2 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% hold (1) | 25% buy / 50% hold / 25% sell (4) |
| Analyst price target | $14 (+9%) | $82 (+0%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (37) | B (75) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 32,027 | 41,496 |
| Founded | 2017 | 1902 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.