Head to head
Daqo New Energy vs ASML Holding
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: DQ · ASML
DQ
Daqo New Energy
10.90-1.62%
1-year price shape — -62% over the period
Quant Rating D · 42/100
vs
ASML
ASML Holding
1,804.96-1.59%
1-year price shape — +81% over the period
Quant Rating B · 90/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ASML Holding edges it on the scoreable measures. ASML Holding has the highest Quant Rating (90); ASML Holding has done best over the past year (+81%); ASML Holding pays the highest dividend yield.
| DQ | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials |
| Last price | 10.90 | 1,804.96 |
| Change today | -1.62% | -1.59% |
| 1-year return | -61.5% | +81.3% |
| Market cap | $737.56M | $693.29B |
| 52-week range | 10.77 – 36.59 | 941.58 – 1,997.38 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -3.82 | 58.54 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 33rd | 99th |
| P/B | 0.17 | 28.37 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -2.55 | 27.66 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-172.55M | $10.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $555.69M | $35.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -16.7% | +21.3% |
| Gross margin | -35.4% | 51.6% |
| Operating margin | -52.2% | 32.7% |
| Net margin | -34.5% | 27.8% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-261.49M | $11.03B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 48.6% | 54.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 5 sell | 0 buy / 0 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.9% | 0.4% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% sell (2) | 100% buy (6) |
| Analyst price target | $16 (+47%) | $2,392 (+33%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (42) | B (90) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 3,842 | 44,000 |
| Founded | 2007 | 1984 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.