Head to head
e.l.f. Beauty vs Procter & Gamble
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ELF · PG
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
105.03+2.18%
1-year price shape — -25% over the period
Quant Rating D · 15/100
vs
PG
Procter & Gamble
147.82-0.40%
1-year price shape — -0% over the period
Quant Rating C · 40/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Procter & Gamble edges it on the scoreable measures. Procter & Gamble has the highest Quant Rating (40); Procter & Gamble has done best over the past year (-0%); Procter & Gamble trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| ELF | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Household & Personal Products | -- |
| Last price | 105.03 | 147.82 |
| Change today | +2.18% | -0.40% |
| 1-year return | -25.3% | -0.2% |
| Market cap | $6.20B | $343.34B |
| 52-week range | 48.82 – 141.50 | 134.62 – 164.77 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 107.17 | 22.33 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 91st | 14th |
| P/B | 5.30 | 6.44 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.88% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.44 | 6.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $25.96M | $15.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.76B | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +35.5% | +1.5% |
| Gross margin | 74.4% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | 11.4% | 22.7% |
| Net margin | 3.4% | 18.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $280.16M | $15.15B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 90.0% | 71.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 19 buy / 31 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 7.1% | 1.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 86% buy / 14% hold (14) | 53% buy / 47% hold (17) |
| Analyst price target | $109 (+4%) | $160 (+8%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (15) | C (40) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 849 | 104,000 |
| Founded | 2004 | 1837 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.