Head to head
Eversource Energy vs NextEra Energy
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ES · NEE
ES
Eversource Energy
65.24-0.03%
1-year price shape — -6% over the period
Quant Rating D · 32/100
vs
NEE
NextEra Energy
77.06-1.05%
1-year price shape — -5% over the period
Quant Rating D · 35/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
NextEra Energy edges it on the scoreable measures. NextEra Energy has the highest Quant Rating (35); NextEra Energy has done best over the past year (-5%).
| ES | NEE | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Utilities - Regulated Electric | Utilities - Regulated Electric |
| Last price | 65.24 | 77.06 |
| Change today | -0.03% | -1.05% |
| 1-year return | -6.3% | -4.7% |
| Market cap | $24.57B | $160.75B |
| 52-week range | 60.64 – 75.68 | 74.41 – 97.30 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 16.90 | 17.32 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 33rd | 13th |
| P/B | 1.50 | 2.81 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 3.09% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 4.56 | 3.30 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $1.72B | $6.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.00B | $28.70B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.3% | +12.4% |
| Gross margin | 85.0% | 61.0% |
| Operating margin | 22.3% | 28.3% |
| Net margin | 10.4% | 32.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $236.71M | $3.05B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 90.4% | 86.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 27 buy / 22 sell | 22 buy / 23 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 38% buy / 50% hold / 12% sell (8) | 64% buy / 36% hold (11) |
| Analyst price target | $75 (+15%) | $102 (+32%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (32) | D (35) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 10,680 | 17,400 |
| Founded | 1966 | 1925 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.