Head to head
Ferrovial SE vs Quanta Services
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: FER · PWR
FER
Ferrovial SE
50.60-1.67%
1-year price shape — -14% over the period
Quant Rating D · 24/100
vs
PWR
Quanta Services
701.07-2.57%
1-year price shape — +66% over the period
Quant Rating B · 87/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Ferrovial SE edges it on the scoreable measures. Ferrovial SE trades cheapest on trailing earnings; Ferrovial SE pays the highest dividend yield.
| FER | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Last price | 50.60 | 701.07 |
| Change today | -1.67% | -2.57% |
| 1-year return | -13.7% | +66.4% |
| Market cap | $36.42B | $105.40B |
| 52-week range | 50.36 – 74.14 | 404.19 – 788.49 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 53.15 | 80.21 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 84th | 91st |
| P/B | 5.68 | 10.94 |
| Dividend yield | 2.51% | 0.06% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.39 | 6.80 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $999.07M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.86B | $32.91B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.0% | +41.1% |
| Gross margin | 88.0% | 15.5% |
| Operating margin | 10.4% | 6.1% |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 4.0% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | -- | $2.39B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 69.5% | 91.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 0 sell | 25 buy / 25 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 0.6% | 2.1% |
| Analyst consensus | 43% buy / 57% hold (7) | 87% buy / 13% hold (15) |
| Analyst price target | $68 (+35%) | $798 (+14%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (24) | B (87) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 22,609 | 69,500 |
| Founded | 2018 | 1997 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.