Head to head
Fortuna Silver Mines vs Newmont
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: FSM · NEM
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
10.12-9.48%
1-year price shape — +15% over the period
Quant Rating D · 54/100
vs
NEM
Newmont
113.54-2.45%
1-year price shape — +32% over the period
Quant Rating B · 71/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Newmont edges it on the scoreable measures. Newmont has the highest Quant Rating (71); Newmont has done best over the past year (+32%); Newmont pays the highest dividend yield.
| FSM | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Gold |
| Last price | 10.12 | 113.54 |
| Change today | -9.48% | -2.45% |
| 1-year return | +15.3% | +31.8% |
| Market cap | $3.00B | $119.64B |
| 52-week range | 7.69 – 13.85 | 75.34 – 135.01 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 8.58 | 14.32 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 38th | 57th |
| P/B | 1.70 | 3.39 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.90% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.90 | 6.39 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $266.36M | $6.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $25.77B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +38.2% | +15.1% |
| Gross margin | 57.2% | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | 48.7% | 55.2% |
| Net margin | 32.0% | 33.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $612.65M | $9.73B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 69.2% | 81.7% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 0 buy / 1 sell | 19 buy / 28 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.4% | 1.6% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 92% buy / 8% hold (12) |
| Analyst price target | $14 (+36%) | $139 (+23%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (54) | B (71) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,294 | 44,100 |
| Founded | 1990 | 1921 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.