Head to head
Glacier Bancorp vs Mizuho Financial
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: GBCI · MFG
GBCI
Glacier Bancorp
42.77-1.86%
1-year price shape — -8% over the period
Quant Rating D · 28/100
vs
MFG
Mizuho Financial
10.77-3.41%
1-year price shape — +72% over the period
Quant Rating B · 88/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Mizuho Financial edges it on the scoreable measures. Mizuho Financial has the highest Quant Rating (88); Mizuho Financial has done best over the past year (+72%); Mizuho Financial trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| GBCI | MFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 42.77 | 10.77 |
| Change today | -1.86% | -3.41% |
| 1-year return | -7.9% | +71.6% |
| Market cap | $5.57B | $131.05B |
| 52-week range | 38.75 – 54.14 | 6.06 – 11.49 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 17.53 | 16.93 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 28th | 93rd |
| P/B | 1.29 | 1.83 |
| Dividend yield | 3.86% | 1.62% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 1.99 | 0.64 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $259.12M | $7.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $4.54T |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +32.2% | +35.7% |
| Gross margin | -- | -- |
| Operating margin | -- | -- |
| Net margin | 26.8% | 30.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $407.27M | $737.37B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 88.4% | 46.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 35 buy / 12 sell | 47 buy / 3 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 7.4% | 0.1% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (3) | 100% buy (1) |
| Analyst price target | $59 (+37%) | -- |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (28) | B (88) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 4,188 | 52,427 |
| Founded | 1955 | 1864 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.