Head to head
The Honest vs Procter & Gamble
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: HNST · PG
HNST
The Honest
4.93-1.99%
1-year price shape — +30% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
vs
PG
Procter & Gamble
147.82-0.40%
1-year price shape — -0% over the period
Quant Rating C · 40/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Procter & Gamble edges it on the scoreable measures. Procter & Gamble pays the highest dividend yield; Procter & Gamble earns the most per share.
| HNST | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Household & Personal Products | -- |
| Last price | 4.93 | 147.82 |
| Change today | -1.99% | -0.40% |
| 1-year return | +30.4% | -0.2% |
| Market cap | $528.91M | $343.34B |
| 52-week range | 2.07 – 6.01 | 134.62 – 164.77 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -44.82 | 22.33 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 18th | 14th |
| P/B | 3.17 | 6.44 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.88% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.14 | 6.62 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-15.02M | $15.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $342.01M | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.9% | +1.5% |
| Gross margin | 35.7% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | -3.1% | 22.7% |
| Net margin | -3.6% | 18.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $52.71M | $15.15B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 48.5% | 71.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 20 buy / 30 sell | 33 buy / 17 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 9.9% | 1.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 67% buy / 33% hold (6) | 53% buy / 47% hold (17) |
| Analyst price target | $5 (+5%) | $160 (+8%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (83) | C (40) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 174 | 104,000 |
| Founded | 2011 | 1837 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.