Head to head
Hesai vs O'Reilly Automotive
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: HSAI · ORLY
HSAI
Hesai
16.00-1.66%
1-year price shape — -40% over the period
Quant Rating E · 6/100
vs
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive
84.61-0.62%
1-year price shape — -17% over the period
Quant Rating D · 20/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
O'Reilly Automotive edges it on the scoreable measures. O'Reilly Automotive has the highest Quant Rating (20); O'Reilly Automotive has done best over the past year (-17%); O'Reilly Automotive trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| HSAI | ORLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Auto Parts |
| Last price | 16.00 | 84.61 |
| Change today | -1.66% | -0.62% |
| 1-year return | -40.5% | -16.9% |
| Market cap | $2.51B | $68.45B |
| 52-week range | 14.29 – 29.35 | 82.59 – 104.06 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 31.75 | 26.86 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 71st | 46th |
| P/B | 1.88 | -37.29 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.44 | 2.97 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $69.77M | $2.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.34B | $18.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +21.9% | +8.1% |
| Gross margin | 40.7% | 51.6% |
| Operating margin | 3.8% | 19.6% |
| Net margin | 14.9% | 14.3% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-709.48M | $2.16B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 53.2% | 90.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 5 buy / 3 sell | 29 buy / 20 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.8% | 3.2% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (6) | 85% buy / 15% hold (20) |
| Analyst price target | $29 (+79%) | $108 (+28%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (6) | D (20) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,118 | 92,923 |
| Founded | 2014 | 1957 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.