Head to head
Hubbell vs Vertiv Holdings
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: HUBB · VRT
HUBB
Hubbell
475.41-2.06%
1-year price shape — +17% over the period
Quant Rating D · 58/100
vs
VRT
Vertiv Holdings
246.49-2.63%
1-year price shape — +55% over the period
Quant Rating D · 83/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Vertiv Holdings edges it on the scoreable measures. Vertiv Holdings has the highest Quant Rating (83); Vertiv Holdings has done best over the past year (+55%).
| HUBB | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Last price | 475.41 | 246.49 |
| Change today | -2.06% | -2.63% |
| 1-year return | +16.5% | +55.3% |
| Market cap | $25.12B | $94.90B |
| 52-week range | 398.95 – 562.06 | 147.72 – 379.76 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 28.15 | 55.77 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 44th | 34th |
| P/B | 6.42 | 19.95 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 0.09% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 16.54 | 3.41 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $873.85M | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.22B | $11.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.3% | +24.1% |
| Gross margin | 35.2% | 38.0% |
| Operating margin | 20.2% | 19.4% |
| Net margin | 14.5% | 15.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $901.40M | $2.92B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 99.1% | 83.5% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 40 buy / 10 sell | 33 buy / 10 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| Analyst consensus | 50% buy / 50% hold (6) | 100% buy (16) |
| Analyst price target | $564 (+19%) | $342 (+39%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (58) | D (83) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 18,000 | 34,000 |
| Founded | 1888 | 1946 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.