Head to head
Ivanhoe Electric vs Southern Copper
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: IE · SCCO
IE
Ivanhoe Electric
9.77-5.88%
1-year price shape — -24% over the period
Quant Rating D · 19/100
vs
SCCO
Southern Copper
200.57-1.81%
1-year price shape — +68% over the period
Quant Rating B · 87/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Southern Copper edges it on the scoreable measures. Southern Copper has the highest Quant Rating (87); Southern Copper has done best over the past year (+68%); Southern Copper pays the highest dividend yield.
| IE | SCCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Copper | Copper |
| Last price | 9.77 | 200.57 |
| Change today | -5.88% | -1.81% |
| 1-year return | -23.9% | +68.2% |
| Market cap | $1.56B | $169.35B |
| 52-week range | 7.86 – 21.55 | 113.90 – 220.78 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -7.40 | 28.98 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 49th | 80th |
| P/B | 2.97 | 13.41 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.79 | 5.30 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-126.08M | $4.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.02M | $15.79B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -32.2% | +40.6% |
| Gross margin | 58.7% | 58.2% |
| Operating margin | -3915.9% | 56.9% |
| Net margin | -1138.7% | 35.9% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-133.96M | $5.10B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 88.5% | 98.4% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 35 buy / 12 sell | 28 buy / 21 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 6.8% | 1.2% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (3) | 29% hold / 71% sell (7) |
| Analyst price target | $19 (+94%) | $156 (-22%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (19) | B (87) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 286 | 16,617 |
| Founded | 2020 | 1952 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.