Head to head
IsoEnergy vs Cameco
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: ISOU · CCJ
ISOU
IsoEnergy
9.62-1.03%
1-year price shape — -10% over the period
Quant Rating C · 68/100
vs
CCJ
Cameco
88.09-1.10%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating D · 45/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Cameco edges it on the scoreable measures. Cameco has done best over the past year (+3%); Cameco pays the highest dividend yield; Cameco earns the most per share.
| ISOU | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | Uranium |
| Last price | 9.62 | 88.09 |
| Change today | -1.03% | -1.10% |
| 1-year return | -10.4% | +3.2% |
| Market cap | $627.74M | $38.37B |
| 52-week range | 7.19 – 13.58 | 77.54 – 135.24 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | -54.97 | 155.09 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 24th | 72nd |
| P/B | 1.65 | 7.67 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | -0.03 | 0.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $-1.83M | $412.45M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0 | $3.47B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -- | -7.2% |
| Gross margin | -- | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | -- | 14.8% |
| Net margin | -- | 10.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-38.16M | $555.92M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 71.7% | 65.9% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 1 buy / 0 sell | 0 buy / 33 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 3.2% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (2) | 89% buy / 11% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | $18 (+90%) | $125 (+42%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | C (68) | D (45) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 41 | 3,082 |
| Founded | 2016 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.