Head to head
LandBridge vs ConocoPhillips
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LB · COP
LB
LandBridge
85.72+0.08%
1-year price shape — +59% over the period
Quant Rating B · 83/100
vs
COP
ConocoPhillips
129.84+0.38%
1-year price shape — +41% over the period
Quant Rating B · 79/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
ConocoPhillips edges it on the scoreable measures. ConocoPhillips trades cheapest on trailing earnings; ConocoPhillips pays the highest dividend yield; ConocoPhillips earns the most per share.
| LB | COP | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Last price | 85.72 | 129.84 |
| Change today | +0.08% | +0.38% |
| 1-year return | +58.5% | +40.6% |
| Market cap | $2.43B | $155.98B |
| 52-week range | 43.55 – 91.57 | 82.95 – 141.62 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 75.86 | 17.17 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 57th | 81st |
| P/B | 6.85 | 2.39 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.54% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.94 | 6.35 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $26.70M | $7.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $225.45M | $63.35B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +40.6% | +36.8% |
| Gross margin | 92.1% | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 61.3% | 21.9% |
| Net margin | 16.2% | 14.6% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $151.28M | $10.06B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 102.5% | 86.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 26 buy / 18 sell | 21 buy / 27 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 12.4% | 1.3% |
| Analyst consensus | 33% buy / 67% hold (3) | 84% buy / 16% hold (19) |
| Analyst price target | $86 (+0%) | $149 (+14%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | B (83) | B (79) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | -- | 9,900 |
| Founded | -- | 1875 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.