Head to head
Centrus Energy vs Cameco
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LEU · CCJ
LEU
Centrus Energy
147.14-4.38%
1-year price shape — -60% over the period
Quant Rating E · 2/100
vs
CCJ
Cameco
89.07-4.25%
1-year price shape — +3% over the period
Quant Rating D · 45/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
Cameco edges it on the scoreable measures. Cameco has the highest Quant Rating (45); Cameco has done best over the past year (+3%); Cameco pays the highest dividend yield.
| LEU | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Uranium | Uranium |
| Last price | 147.14 | 89.07 |
| Change today | -4.38% | -4.25% |
| 1-year return | -60.2% | +3.2% |
| Market cap | $3.01B | $38.79B |
| 52-week range | 135.75 – 464.25 | 77.54 – 135.24 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 77.85 | 156.81 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 98th | 72nd |
| P/B | 3.56 | 7.75 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 3.90 | 0.95 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $79.77M | $412.45M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $473.90M | $3.47B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.0% | -7.2% |
| Gross margin | 23.7% | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | 1.6% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $-163.80M | $555.92M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 85.4% | 65.9% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 23 buy / 23 sell | 0 buy / 33 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 27.2% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 64% buy / 36% hold (14) | 89% buy / 11% hold (9) |
| Analyst price target | $243 (+65%) | $125 (+41%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | E (2) | D (45) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 467 | 3,082 |
| Founded | 1992 | 1988 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.