Head to head
Lincoln Educational Services vs New Oriental
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LINC · EDU
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services
22.38-1.58%
1-year price shape — +5% over the period
Quant Rating F · 38/100
vs
EDU
New Oriental
57.46+0.27%
1-year price shape — +12% over the period
Quant Rating C · 51/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
New Oriental edges it on the scoreable measures. New Oriental has the highest Quant Rating (51); New Oriental has done best over the past year (+12%); New Oriental trades cheapest on trailing earnings.
| LINC | EDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | -- | -- |
| Last price | 22.38 | 57.46 |
| Change today | -1.58% | +0.27% |
| 1-year return | +4.8% | +11.9% |
| Market cap | $709.93M | $8.90B |
| 52-week range | 17.29 – 56.34 | 44.25 – 64.22 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 30.66 | 19.15 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 57th | 42nd |
| P/B | 3.51 | 2.23 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 0.64 | 3.00 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $20.30M | $464.72M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $570.78M | $5.66B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.4% | +23.0% |
| Gross margin | 59.8% | 54.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 11.4% |
| Net margin | 4.0% | 8.4% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $24.53M | $780.17M |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 94.5% | 64.1% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 20 buy / 30 sell | 0 buy / 9 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 8.9% | 2.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 100% buy (4) | 80% buy / 20% hold (5) |
| Analyst price target | $46 (+107%) | $75 (+30%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | F (38) | C (51) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 2,640 | 88,372 |
| Founded | 1946 | 1993 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.