Head to head
Landstar System vs United Parcel Service
Side-by-side on the measures that matter, with a plain-English read. Full detail: LSTR · UPS
LSTR
Landstar System
166.98-1.22%
1-year price shape — +38% over the period
Quant Rating D · 77/100
vs
UPS
United Parcel Service
92.29-0.88%
1-year price shape — +14% over the period
Quant Rating D · 55/100
1-year performance, rebased to 100
United Parcel Service edges it on the scoreable measures. United Parcel Service trades cheapest on trailing earnings; United Parcel Service pays the highest dividend yield; United Parcel Service earns the most per share.
| LSTR | UPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Sector | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Last price | 166.98 | 92.29 |
| Change today | -1.22% | -0.88% |
| 1-year return | +38.0% | +14.4% |
| Market cap | $5.67B | $78.52B |
| 52-week range | 118.64 – 227.94 | 76.95 – 116.86 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 43.26 | 17.15 |
| P/E percentile, own 5-yr range | 87th | 64th |
| P/B | 6.77 | 5.21 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 7.11% |
| Profitability & growth | ||
| EPS (TTM) | 3.31 | 6.56 |
| Net profit (TTM) | $112.33M | $5.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.98B | $89.93B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.2% | +7.6% |
| Gross margin | 13.3% | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 3.9% | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 5.1% |
| Free cash flow (TTM) | $175.65M | $5.46B |
| Ownership & sentiment | ||
| Institutional ownership | 103.8% | 64.2% |
| Insider activity (12mo) | 30 buy / 19 sell | 34 buy / 11 sell |
| Short interest (% of float) | 4.9% | 3.0% |
| Analyst consensus | 33% buy / 50% hold / 17% sell (12) | 50% buy / 39% hold / 11% sell (18) |
| Analyst price target | $200 (+20%) | $116 (+26%) |
| StockVane view | ||
| StockVane Quant Rating | D (77) | D (55) |
| Company | ||
| Employees | 1,378 | 460,000 |
| Founded | 1991 | 1907 |
▲ marks the more favourable stock(s) on measures with a clear direction (lower P/E, higher yield, higher Quant Rating, better 1-year return). Analyst consensus counts each covering institution once, at its most recent rating. Not a recommendation. Quant Rating method: Data & Methodology.